Intel Brief: Will the U.S. Attack Iran? Conflict Forecast (March 16-30, 2025)

Executive Summary

Tensions between the United States and Iran have reached a critical point following a series of military escalations and diplomatic breakdowns. Over the past month, the Trump administration has intensified airstrikes against Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen, issued direct warnings to Tehran, and faced increased Iranian military activity, including the interception of a U.S. surveillance drone near Iranian airspace. With Iran’s leadership rejecting diplomatic overtures and vowing to retaliate against any perceived aggression, the possibility of a broader conflict in the Middle East has significantly increased.

Based on intelligence assessments and military developments, four primary scenarios are projected over the next two weeks (March 16-30, 2025):

1. No Direct U.S. Attack on Iran (45%) – The most probable outcome involves continued U.S. airstrikes on Iranian proxies, particularly in Yemen, Iraq, and Syria, without directly targeting Iran itself. Washington will likely intensify economic sanctions and diplomatic pressure, avoiding full-scale military engagement.
2. Limited U.S. Airstrikes on Iranian Military Targets (30%) – The Trump administration may conduct targeted strikes on Iranian military assets, such as IRGC bases, missile sites, or naval facilities in response to further provocations. Iran is expected to retaliate through proxy groups rather than direct confrontation.
3. Major U.S. Military Operation Against Iran (15%) – A lower-probability but high-impact scenario involves preemptive U.S. military action against Iran’s nuclear facilities and strategic military assets. This could result in severe Iranian retaliation, including missile strikes on U.S. bases, Israel, and Saudi Arabia, escalating into a regional war.
4. De-escalation via Diplomatic Mediation (10%) – Backchannel negotiations through UAE, Oman, or Qatar could lead to a temporary de-escalation. However, with Iran rejecting Trump’s latest diplomatic offer, the likelihood of a negotiated resolution remains low.

The next 72 to 96 hours will be critical in determining the trajectory of this conflict. Intelligence monitoring will focus on U.S. military deployments, Iranian troop movements, cyberwarfare threats, and potential proxy attacks. While full-scale war is not the most likely outcome, the risk of a miscalculation leading to a major conflict remains a serious concern. If the US attacks the Behshad Iranian spy spy currently in the Red Sea, this would be a potent indicator of imminent conflict

Background & Current Indicators

U.S.-Iran Tensions: A Fragile Standoff

The geopolitical relationship between the United States and Iran has been characterized by decades of hostility, punctuated by periods of indirect conflict, proxy warfare, and failed diplomatic engagements. Since President Donald Trump’s return to office in January 2025, tensions have escalated rapidly, driven by Iran’s continued support for proxy groups, its nuclear program, and a more aggressive U.S. posture in the Middle East.

Key Developments Leading to the Current Crisis

1. U.S. Airstrikes on Iranian Proxies
   • The Trump administration launched multiple airstrikes against Iranian-backed Houthi forces in Yemen following their attacks on Red Sea commercial shipping and U.S. warships.
   • Iran publicly condemned the strikes, claiming they were part of a broader U.S. effort to destabilize the region.

2. Iranian Military Response & Drone Interception

• On March 16, 2025, Iran’s Nournews agency reported that an RQ-4C Triton surveillance drone was forced to retreat from Iranian airspace after being approached by Iranian F-14 fighter jets and drones.
• The Iranian Air Force declared that its forces are at "full combat readiness", signaling an elevated threat level.

3. Trump’s Direct Warnings to Iran

• In a public address on March 15, Trump explicitly blamed Iran for continued Houthi attacks, warning that the U.S. would respond "at a time and place of our choosing."
• Israeli and Saudi intelligence reports indicate that Iran has placed several of its missile defense systems on high alert, anticipating possible U.S. or Israeli strikes.

1. Breakdown of Diplomatic Engagements
   • On March 12, a Trump administration letter, delivered via UAE intermediaries, proposed negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program.
   • Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei rejected the offer, calling it a "deception" and a sign of U.S. desperation.
   • This rejection closes the door on a quick diplomatic resolution, further increasing the risk of military escalation.

4. U.S. Military Build-Up in the Region

• The U.S. has significantly increased naval patrols in the Persian Gulf and Red Sea.
• Reports indicate the deployment of additional missile defense systems to U.S. bases in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE.
• The USS Dwight D. Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group has been repositioned closer to Iranian territorial waters, a move seen as a deterrence signal.

Why This Matters: Signals of Possible U.S. Action

• The combination of military escalations, public threats, and diplomatic breakdowns suggests that the next two weeks will be critical in determining whether the U.S. engages in direct military action against Iran.
• While Trump has avoided full-scale wars in the past, his rhetoric and military positioning indicate that Iranian provocations may push him toward targeted strikes.
• Iran’s strategy remains ambiguous, but its proxy forces in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen are likely preparing asymmetrical retaliatory measures against U.S. interests.

The next section will outline the probability of each scenario based on available intelligence and historical precedents. U.S. military actions, Iranian countermeasures, and diplomatic shifts will determine whether the crisis escalates or stabilizes.

Likely Scenarios & Probabilities

Based on current intelligence, military activity, and historical precedent, we assess four primary scenarios that could unfold between March 16 and March 30, 2025. Each scenario includes a probability estimate, key triggers, and expected outcomes.

Scenario 1: No Direct U.S. Attack on Iran (45%)

Likelihood: ★★★★☆ (Moderate-High Probability)

Key Triggers:

✔ U.S. continues airstrikes on Iranian-backed proxies (Houthis in Yemen, IRGC-affiliated groups in Iraq and Syria).
✔ Iran avoids direct escalation, opting for covert retaliation via cyberattacks and proxy forces.
✔ Gulf states (UAE, Saudi Arabia, Oman) pressure Washington to de-escalate.

Expected Outcomes:

• Continued U.S. strikes on Houthi targets and IRGC bases in Syria/Iraq, but no direct attack on Iranian soil.
• Increased Iranian cyber operations targeting U.S. military infrastructure, energy networks, and financial institutions.
• Israeli airstrikes on Iranian positions in Syria increase, but not coordinated with U.S. forces.
• No major U.S. troop deployments beyond current regional assets.

Assessment:
This is the most likely outcome, as it allows the U.S. to maintain maximum pressure on Iran without committing to direct conflict. Iran, facing economic strain and internal unrest, is unlikely to provoke a direct war.

Scenario 2: Limited U.S. Airstrikes on Iranian Military Targets (30%)

Likelihood: ★★★☆☆ (Moderate Probability)

Key Triggers:

✔ Iran directly attacks a U.S. base in Iraq, Syria, or the Gulf region.
✔ Iranian proxies (Kata’ib Hezbollah, Houthis) escalate attacks on U.S. and allied assets.
✔ Trump seeks a show of force ahead of 2024 election season to reinforce foreign policy strength.

Expected Outcomes:

• U.S. airstrikes on IRGC facilities in Syria, Iraq, or possibly inside Iran (e.g., missile depots, naval bases in Bandar Abbas).
• Iran retaliates through asymmetric warfare, targeting U.S. forces in Iraq and launching drone/missile attacks on Saudi/UAE oil facilities.
• Russia and China condemn U.S. actions but do not directly intervene.
• Oil prices surge, affecting global markets.

Assessment:
A 30% probability suggests this remains a real possibility. The Biden administration’s 2022 Syria airstrikes set a precedent for limited military action against Iranian targets. However, Trump’s past reluctance for full-scale war suggests he may prefer economic and cyber warfare over direct bombing runs.

Scenario 3: Major U.S. Military Operation Against Iran (15%)

Likelihood: ★★☆☆☆ (Low Probability)

Key Triggers:

✔ Iran launches a large-scale missile/drone attack on a U.S. military base or ally (Israel, Saudi Arabia, UAE).
✔ A U.S. naval vessel is attacked in the Persian Gulf (as in the 1988 Operation Praying Mantis).
✔ Iran accelerates its nuclear program, breaching uranium enrichment limits beyond the 90% threshold.

Expected Outcomes:

• Full-scale U.S. air campaign targeting Iranian military infrastructure (nuclear sites, IRGC headquarters, naval bases).
• Iran retaliates with ballistic missile strikes on U.S. bases in the Middle East.
• Iran activates Hezbollah for attacks against Israel.
• Escalation to regional war, with Israel launching preemptive strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Assessment:
While this scenario is unlikely (15%), the risk of rapid escalation is real. Iran’s nuclear ambitions and its aggressive proxy strategy could push the U.S. toward a decisive military response. However, the Trump administration would likely prefer a “surgical” strike approach over full-scale invasion.

Scenario 4: De-escalation via Diplomatic Mediation (10%)

Likelihood: ★☆☆☆☆ (Very Low Probability)

Key Triggers:

✔ Gulf states (UAE, Oman, Qatar) broker backchannel diplomacy between U.S. and Iran.
✔ Iran temporarily freezes nuclear enrichment in exchange for sanctions relief.
✔ U.S. shifts to covert cyberwarfare tactics instead of military strikes.

Expected Outcomes:

• Iran agrees to limited cooperation on nuclear restrictions but retains proxy warfare strategies.
• Trump claims “diplomatic victory” without full military engagement.
• No significant military action, but regional tensions remain high.

Assessment:
Given Iran’s recent rejection of U.S. diplomatic outreach, the probability of de-escalation within two weeks remains low (10%). However, regional stakeholders (Saudi Arabia, UAE) may pressure both sides to avoid conflict.

Conclusion: What to Expect in the Next Two Weeks

1. Most Likely Outcome (45%) – U.S. continues proxy strikes without attacking Iran directly.
2. Moderate Risk (30%) – U.S. conducts targeted strikes on Iranian military assets if provoked.
3. Low Risk (15%) – Full-scale U.S. military operation against Iran.
4. Unlikely (10%) – Diplomatic resolution via Gulf state mediation.

Next Steps for Intelligence Monitoring:

• Track U.S. and Iranian troop movements (Persian Gulf, Iraq, Syria).
• Monitor Iranian cyber activity (potential U.S. infrastructure attacks).
• Watch for additional Israeli involvement, as Tel Aviv may act unilaterally.

The next 72 hours will be crucial in determining whether conflict escalates. The situation remains fluid, and intelligence indicators suggest that even a small trigger event could shift the probability matrix rapidly.

Geopolitical & Military Implications

The potential escalation of the U.S.-Iran conflict will have far-reaching consequences beyond the immediate military engagement. A U.S. attack—whether targeted or large-scale—would trigger regional instability, economic disruptions, and diplomatic realignments across the Middle East and beyond.

Regional Impact: How Key Players Will React

Israel: Strong Support for U.S. Military Action

✔ Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has long advocated for preemptive strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities.
✔ If the U.S. strikes Iranian military assets, Israel will likely launch parallel airstrikes on Iranian proxies in Syria, Lebanon, and possibly Iraq.
✔ A major U.S. military operation could prompt Iranian-backed Hezbollah to launch rocket attacks on northern Israel, sparking a secondary conflict.

Risk Level: HIGH – Israel is prepared for escalation and may act unilaterally if necessary.

Saudi Arabia & the Gulf States: Between War and Mediation

✔ Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) is wary of a full-scale U.S.-Iran war but would support targeted U.S. strikes on Iran’s missile sites and military assets.
✔ The UAE and Oman will likely attempt diplomatic mediation to prevent regional economic fallout.
✔ Iran could retaliate by attacking Saudi/UAE oil infrastructure, similar to the 2019 Aramco attack.

Risk Level: MODERATE – Saudi Arabia supports limited U.S. action but fears regional destabilization.

Iraq: A Likely Iranian Proxy Battleground

✔ Iranian-backed militias (Kata’ib Hezbollah, Asaib Ahl al-Haq) will increase attacks on U.S. forces stationed in Iraq.
✔ The Baghdad government will struggle to maintain neutrality, facing pressure from both Washington and Tehran.
✔ If the U.S. launches airstrikes inside Iran, Iraqi airspace will likely become a key logistical corridor for U.S. bombers.

Risk Level: HIGH – Iraq will see increased proxy warfare and internal political turmoil.

Turkey: Cautious Neutrality with Strategic Moves

✔ Turkey will not directly intervene, but it may increase military patrols along its Iraqi border to prevent Iranian-backed militias from destabilizing northern Iraq.
✔ President Erdogan may leverage the crisis to demand greater influence over regional diplomacy and NATO support.

Risk Level: LOW – Turkey will watch carefully but avoid direct involvement.

Global Implications: Economic & Strategic Fallout

Oil Prices & Global Economy

✔ Any military escalation in the Persian Gulf will immediately spike oil prices, potentially pushing Brent crude above $120 per barrel.
✔ A prolonged conflict could trigger a global recession, impacting energy-dependent economies (China, India, Europe).
✔ The Biden administration and European allies will pressure Trump to de-escalate to prevent economic fallout.

Risk Level: CRITICAL – A U.S.-Iran war would severely disrupt global oil markets.

China & Russia: Political & Military Maneuvering

✔ China will oppose U.S. action but will avoid direct intervention. Instead, it may increase oil imports from Iran to stabilize its economy.
✔ Russia could exploit the crisis by deepening defense ties with Iran, including providing advanced air defense systems (S-400s).
✔ Cyberwarfare activity from both China and Russia is expected to increase against U.S. military and financial institutions.

Risk Level: MODERATE – China and Russia will not intervene militarily but will escalate economic and cyber confrontations.

U.S. Domestic Impact: Trump's Political Calculus

✔ Trump faces a major decision: Military action could boost his strongman image or risk an unpopular war ahead of the 2024 election cycle.
✔ Republican hawks (Bolton, Cotton) will push for aggressive action, while realists (DeSantis, J.D. Vance) may advise restraint.
✔ Anti-war sentiment in the U.S. remains high, but a limited strike against Iran’s military assets could be politically sellable.

Risk Level: HIGH – The decision will heavily impact Trump’s reelection strategy.

Conclusion: What Comes Next?

• The next two weeks will define the scope of U.S. action and Iran’s response strategy.
• The most immediate risk is proxy retaliation, rather than direct Iranian strikes on U.S. soil.
• Israel and Saudi Arabia’s actions could significantly influence Trump’s decision-making.

The situation remains highly fluid, and intelligence monitoring must focus on Iran’s military posturing, proxy activity, and Gulf state diplomatic moves.

Intelligence Gaps & Unknown Variables

While current intelligence provides a strong foundation for assessing potential U.S.-Iran conflict scenarios, several critical unknowns could alter the strategic landscape within the next two weeks. These intelligence gaps must be closely monitored to refine threat assessments and adjust tactical planning.

Key Intelligence Gaps

1. Iran’s Internal Decision-Making Process

✔ Will Iran directly retaliate against the U.S., or continue using proxy forces?
✔ How much control does Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei maintain over the IRGC’s independent operations?
✔ Could internal political pressure force Iran into an unexpected course of action?

Why It Matters:

• If Iran’s hardliners push for direct missile strikes on U.S. assets, the conflict could escalate rapidly.
• If Khamenei loses control over the IRGC, rogue elements could initiate an attack independently, forcing an American response.

2. Will Trump Order a Direct Strike Inside Iran?

✔ Does Trump view Iran as a necessary military target, or is this posturing for deterrence?
✔ How much influence do hawkish advisors (e.g., John Bolton) have on Trump’s Iran policy?
✔ Would Trump use military action to rally political support ahead of the 2024 election?

Why It Matters:

• If Trump authorizes limited airstrikes, Iran may respond aggressively, triggering wider escalation.
• If political motivations outweigh strategic logic, decision-making could become unpredictable.

3. Russia & China’s Role in a U.S.-Iran Confrontation

✔ Will Russia provide military aid (e.g., S-400 air defense systems) to Iran?
✔ Will China increase oil purchases from Iran to mitigate economic damage?
✔ How will both nations respond to a U.S. military escalation?

Why It Matters:

• Russian air defense technology could strengthen Iran’s defensive capabilities, complicating U.S. airstrikes.
• China’s economic backing could help Iran mitigate the impact of U.S. sanctions, prolonging tensions.

4. Potential Cyberwarfare & Asymmetric Attacks

✔ Will Iran launch cyberattacks on U.S. critical infrastructure (power grids, financial networks, military systems)?
✔ Could Iranian-backed hackers target U.S. elections or disinformation campaigns to weaken Trump politically?
✔ Are U.S. cyber defenses prepared for a full-scale Iranian digital offensive?

Why It Matters:

• A major cyberattack on U.S. infrastructure could prompt non-military retaliation, altering the conflict trajectory.
• Iran has advanced cyberwarfare capabilities and could deploy deniable cyberattacks instead of direct military confrontation.

5. Possible “Black Swan” Events

✔ Could an unexpected event—like an assassination or hostage crisis—trigger immediate escalation?
✔ Would an Israeli preemptive strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities force Trump’s hand?
✔ Could Iran’s proxies miscalculate and attack a high-profile U.S. target, triggering full-scale retaliation?

Why It Matters:

• A high-impact, unpredictable event could override existing strategic calculations, leading to war faster than expected.
• Historical precedent (e.g., Soleimani’s assassination in 2020) shows that one misstep can spiral into major conflict.

Conclusion: Intelligence Priorities for the Next 72 Hours

✔ Monitor IRGC movements for signs of imminent retaliation.
✔ Track diplomatic backchannels to detect any last-minute efforts at de-escalation.
✔ Watch for cyberwarfare indicators, as Iran may choose asymmetric attacks over direct military engagement.

The next 72 hours are critical—any of these intelligence gaps could shift the probability model dramatically, requiring rapid reassessment of conflict scenarios.

Conclusion & Recommendations

Summary of Most Probable Outcomes

Based on current intelligence, military activity, and geopolitical maneuvering, the most likely outcome over the next two weeks is:

✔ Continued U.S. airstrikes on Iranian-backed proxies (45%), particularly in Yemen, Syria, and Iraq, rather than direct attacks on Iran itself.
✔ Moderate risk (30%) of targeted U.S. strikes on Iranian military infrastructure if Iran escalates through direct proxy attacks on U.S. assets.
✔ Low probability (15%) of full-scale U.S. military engagement, as Trump has historically avoided direct war with Iran.
✔ Unlikely (10%) that diplomatic de-escalation will occur, given Iran’s rejection of recent negotiation efforts.

Key Recommendations for Intelligence Monitoring

1. Track U.S. and Iranian Military Movements

✔ Monitor air and naval deployments in the Persian Gulf to detect signs of imminent escalation.
✔ Watch for Iranian missile positioning near key U.S., Israeli, and Saudi targets.
✔ Observe any movement of U.S. bombers (B-52s, F-35s) toward Middle Eastern bases, signaling potential airstrikes.

2. Assess Cyberwarfare & Asymmetric Threats

✔ Iran’s cyber units may attempt retaliation instead of direct military engagement.
✔ Monitor attacks on U.S. financial institutions, government systems, and power grids.
✔ Expect pro-Iranian disinformation campaigns in global media.

3. Evaluate Proxy Retaliation Risks

✔ Increased rocket/missile attacks by Hezbollah or Iraqi militias could trigger a wider escalation.
✔ Iran may activate Houthi forces for further attacks on Red Sea shipping routes.

4. Political Considerations & Diplomatic Channels

✔ Monitor Gulf State mediation efforts, as Saudi/UAE leaders may try to prevent escalation.
✔ Watch for shifts in Trump’s rhetoric, which could indicate last-minute changes in strategy.

Final Assessment: What Happens Next?

The next 72 to 96 hours will be critical in shaping whether this remains a proxy conflict or escalates into a full-scale U.S.-Iran confrontation. While a direct U.S. attack on Iran is not inevitable, the risk of miscalculation remains dangerously high.